Print This Page Done

Immigration Issue Centers : Environment

Traffic Congestion
 
Printer-Friendly Version
Send this article to a friend!
 

As population grows, driven largely by immigration levels that add more than one million new residents to the United States each year, more traffic crowds our roadways. We pay the price in damage to our environment and quality of life.

Across the U.S., more people are spending more time sitting in traffic than ever before: Nationwide, the average commute increased 14 percent in the last ten years, from 22.4 minutes in 1990 to 25.5 minutes in 2000.1

Around the United States

California already has five of the nation's 20 most congested metro areas, and traffic jams statewide cost $21 billion a year in lost time and wasted fuel. Los Angeles has been the most traffic-choked urban area in the country for 15 years in a row.9 The state's official forecast says the number of miles driven on Los Angeles and Orange County roads will increase 40 percent by 2020. In Sacramento, even with $15 billion in planned road improvements, congestion will increase by 400 percent in the next 20 years.10 In the San Fernando Valley area, the average morning rush-hour speed of 31 mph is expected to fall to 16 mph by 2025.11 The total vehicle miles traveled in the region almost doubled in the last 20 years.12

In Florida, the total vehicle miles traveled doubled in the last 20 years.13 Tampa commuters sit in rush-hour traffic for 45 hours a year.14 By 2020, the number of miles traveled on Florida roads is expected to rise by 58 percent.15

In metro Atlanta, the number of miles driven each day on the area's roads is expected to rise by about 42 million miles by 2025--about half the distance from the Earth to the sun.16 The vice chairman for transportation of the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce predicts that by 2010, Atlantans will spend more time in traffic than at home.17

In Chicago, rush hour now lasts almost eight hours a day. Area drivers each wasted an average of 67 hours, 104 gallons of gas, and $1,235 sitting in traffic in 2000.18

In Texas, 26 percent of freeways are congested. Vehicle traffic on the state's highways has increased by one-third in ten years.19 Traffic in Austin is expected to be worse than current Los Angeles traffic by 2025.20 Texas traffic is growing so quickly that even if public transit use were to double, the gain would be canceled out by population growth in as little as three months, according to the Texas Public Policy Foundation.21

In Salt Lake City, the average rush-hour commuter spent 20 hours in gridlock during 2000 versus three hours in 1980. The total cost of traffic congestion to Salt Lake motorists is $170 million.22

Within the next 20 years, Northern Virginia's increase in population will be two to three times greater than the planned increase in highway capacity, according to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.23

In many areas of the country, traffic congestion has become a major quality of life issue that impacts decisions as fundamental as where to buy a home or where to work.

While increasing roadways and alternative transportation methods can help decrease traffic congestion, the problem continues to grow if population continues to expand.

  • The average urban driver spent 62 hours sitting in traffic in 2000, compared to just 16 in 1982--an increase of 288 percent.2
  • More than half of major roads are crowded during rush hour, up from a third in 1982.3
  • Two out of every five urban interstate miles are congested with traffic at volumes that result in significant delays. The proportion of urban interstate miles that are considered congested increased from 33 to 41 percent from 1996 to 2001.4
  • The Texas Transportation Institute's annual study of traffic congestion in 75 urban areas found that in 2000 rush hours lasted longer and were more extensive than the previous year and cost the country $68 billion a year. These costs were due to from 3.6 billion hours of delay and 5.7 billion gallons of wasted fuel.5
  • Aside from time wasted and fuel consumed, traffic can have larger economic consequences, such as affecting a city's ability to attract new business. Traffic congestion in Atlanta has become so bad that the Chamber of Commerce called it the greatest threat to the city's economic prosperity.6 As traffic worsens, cities often have to turn to taxpayers for funding for additional roads.7
  • Increased traffic means higher greenhouse gas emissions, degraded local and regional ecosystems, and damage to natural habitats and species.8
  1. Table DP-1-4, Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 1990 and 2000, Census 2000, U.S. Census Bureau.
  2. Press Release, "Annual Study Shows Traffic Jams as a Growing Triple Threat," 2002 Urban Mobility Study, Texas Transportation Institute.
  3. The Short Report," 2002 Urban Mobility Study, Texas Transportation Institute.
  4. Press Release, "Congestion Eroding Interstate System's Safety and Economic Benefits," The Road Information Project, January 16, 2003.
  5. "The Short Report," 2002 Urban Mobility Study, Texas Transportation Institute.
  6. Larry Copeland, "Traffic Nightmares Beginning to Cost Cities," USA Today, October 18, 2002.
  7. Ibid.
  8. "MIT Worldwide Mobility Study Warns of Chronic Gridlock, Pollution," MIT News Release, October 30, 2001.
  9. Hugo Martin, "No Idle Boast: L.A. Traffic Worst Again," Los Angeles Times, June 21, 2002.
  10. Jim Wasserman, "2020 Traffic Report: Growth Means More Time Behind the Wheel for Everyone," Associated Press, September 19, 2002.
  11. Lisa Mascaro, "Looming Traffic Crisis," Daily News of Los Angeles, August 4, 2002.
  12. "Sprawl Hits the Wall," Southern California Studies Center, University of Southern California, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, 2001.
  13. Jennifer Audette, "Losing Patience," The Ledger (Lakeland, Florida), January 7, 2001.
  14. Kathy Steele, "Rush Hour Making Commutes Even Longer," Tampa Tribune, June 21, 2002.
  15. "It's Time Florida Required a True Accounting of Growth's Costs," Tampa Tribune, January 2, 2001.
  16. "Can Metro Atlanta Cope?" Atlanta Journal Constitution, May 30, 2002.
  17. Carl V. Patton, "How Atlanta Can Wean Itself from Car Addiction," Atlanta Business Chronicle, March 30, 1998.
  18. Robert McCoppin, "You Wasted $1,235 and 67 Hours Sitting in Traffic, Study Says," Chicago Daily Herald, June 24, 2002.
  19. "2001 Report Card for America's Infrastructure," American Society of Civil Engineers, March 2001.
  20. Thomas A. Rubin and Wendell Cox, "The Road Ahead: Innovations for Better Transportation in Texas," Texas Public Policy Foundation, February 27, 2001.
  21. Ibid.
  22. Zack Van Eyck, "S.L. Ranks Low in Traffic Gridlock," Deseret News, June 22, 2002.
  23. Hiawatha Nicely, "Northern Virginia's Gridlock Affects the Entire State," Roanoke Times & World News, February 16, 2002.

Updated 3/03

 

Back to Top

Related Resources
Find Your Legislator