Marijuana Crimes Are Still a Deportable Offense Under Federal Law

A number of states have recentlyamended their laws to “de-criminalize” the possession and distribution ofmarijuana.

As FAIR has noted, many open borders advocates have argued that aliens with state cannabis convictions should no longer be subject to deportation. According to the open borders contingent, deporting aliens with marijuana convictions in states that have “legalized” cannabis, “is but the latest hard-line stance taken toward immigrants and immigration by the Trump administration.”

That’s an interesting claim, because, according to the Los Angeles Times, the resoundingly liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that, “California’s legalization of marijuana doesn’t protect immigrants from deportation if they were convicted of pot crimes before voters approved the new law in 2016.”

As KTLA-5summarized the court’s holding, “federal immigration law does not recognize the state’s decision to reclassify a valid conviction.” That’s because cannabis is still a controlled substance under federal law. And federal law is applicable in all 50 states and all U.S. territories.

Despite misleading reports in thepopular press, marijuana has not actually been legalized in a California, orany of the other states claiming to have legalized it. Yes, some jurisdictionshave removed the possession and distribution of cannabis from their localcriminal codes. However, while individuals may no longer be subject to stateprosecution for having or selling marijuana, they continue to be subject tofederal prosecution.

In fact, pursuant to Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution, known as the Supremacy Clause, federal law takes precedence over state laws. So, contrary to popular opinion, the possession and distribution of marijuana remains a criminal offense everywhere in the United States. And the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) explicitly denies immigration benefits to foreign nationals who possess or traffic in illicit drugs.

Therefore, any alien who has a valid conviction for the possession or sale of marijuana is subject to removal from the United States. That’s why lawfully present immigrants working in marijuana dispensaries that are “legal” under state law have been denied citizenship and have been deported.

The claims that this is somehow unfair (and “racist”) are utterly specious:

• U.S. citizens are subject to the very same lawsgoverning marijuana use, possession and sales. A native-born American who worksin a “legal” pot dispensary in Colorado or Seattle will be denied a federaljob, can’t qualify for a security clearance and likely won’t be eligible for ahost of professional licenses and trade certifications (e.g., aviation, maritime, HAZMAT transport, etc.)

• Despite highly publicized polls claiming that a majority of Americans favor the legalization of marijuana, proposals to decriminalize the drug remain controversial. Thirty-three states have legalized medical marijuana, prescribed and used under the supervision of a licensed physician. However, only 10 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for recreational use. And most law enforcement professionals remain staunchly against the legalization of pot.

While there is no nationalconsensus about whether we should legalize weed, there is a clear consensus about immigration law – Americans wantthe INA enforced, as written. So, until such time as U.S. citizens prevail uponCongress to change federal pot laws, marijuana use and the cannabis industryremain off-limits to foreign nationals who want to keep their visas or becomecitizens.