Illegal Immigration’s Drag on San Antonio
Bythe lights of a shiny new study touting the supposed economic benefits ofimmigration, the South Texas city of San Antonio should be one of the mostaffluent urban areas in America, or at least the state. It’s neither, and noteven close.
The New American Economy — which calls itself a “bipartisan research and advocacy organization fighting for smart federal, state and local immigration policies” – reported this month that 30 percent of San Antonio’s business owners are immigrants.
Fromthat factoid, NAE extrapolates that the nation’s seventh largest city isenriching itself through immigration. “Having immigrants is an asset, so citiesare starting to compete with who’s more welcoming,” NAE director Kate Brickasserted.
NAEestimates that San Antonio’s immigrant households accounted for $3.6 billion in“spending power” in 2017. The report noted that illegal aliens, comprisingroughly one-third of the city’s immigrant population, earned $1.1 billion.
This means at least a portion of that $1.1 billion did not go to legal residents of San Antonio, where 37,600 people are currently out of work and collecting unemployment. Meanwhile, illegal aliens typically labor in a shadow economy where predatory employers exploit workers by paying under-market wages.
Contrary to NAE’s glowing account of immigrants’ economic clout, San Antonio is the poorest big city in Texas. Its poverty rate is second highest among large U.S. cities (just behind Detroit).
Thisis partly due to the presence of 63,000 (NAE’s conservative estimate) illegalaliens who earn far less on average than better-educated, higher-skilled legalworkers.
Just two hours north of the border, San Antonio’s immigrant population is predominantly from Mexico, and the Migration Policy Institute reports that the city attracted the least “highly skilled” Mexican immigrants of any Texas metro area. Though educational attainment has improved, fewer than one in five Mexican arrivals holds a college degree.
Thenthere’s the matter of remittances.
Legal and illegal migrants in the U.S. sent $53.4 billion to Mexico and Central America last year. Despite their humble circumstances, an estimated 83 percent of Mexicans illegally in the U.S. wired money home. It’s reasonable to assume San Antonio’s Mexican immigrants send their fair share home too.
Anillegal alien who remits 10 percent of his income is funneling as much money toMexico as he purportedly pays in U.S., state and local taxes. Viewed anotherway, every dollar that goes south is one less dollar circulating through theSan Antonio economy.
NAEdoes not mention remittances in its report, and did not respond to FAIR’sinquiries about this ongoing siphoning of assets.
Nor did NAE reference the documented drag that illegal immigration has on San Antonio and Texas at large. FAIR estimates that illegal aliens cost the state $10,994,614,550 annually in public benefits and services received.
Without an honest tally on the expense side of the ledger – as well as clear distinctions between legal and illegal immigrants — sweeping claims of immigration as an economic engine simply sputter and go nowhere.